Re: BinNMUs wanted for libpng issues
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:22:52AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Please forward this whereever appropriate.
>> The following packages were built against the libpng with overly strict
>> shlibs on one or more architectures, and to ease testing transition
>> problems, binNMUs are desired.
>
>> (See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/10/msg00149.html )
>
>> libwxgtk2.4-dev (m68k, source is wxwindows)
>
> m68k is the one arch we can't do binNMUs on yet. We're also ignoring it
> for testing transitions, so there's not really a hurry either.
Hmm, is britney clever enough to notice that and allow libpng in?
I guess so.
>> libgdk-pixbuf2 (arm, source is gdk-pixbuf)
>
> Already been queued; it failed, given back again.
Looks like it built.
>> gif2png (arm)
>
> Queued. Arm is struggling to keep up right now, so it may take a bit for
> a build to happen.
Looks like it built.
>> gdk-imlib11 (sparc, source is imlib)
>
> Also queued.
Looks like it built.
>> dillo (sparc -- but deserves rebuild on all arches for new openssl)
>
> only i386 and ia64 have a dependency on libssl0.9.7. Queued on these
> three archs.
>
>> ygraph (arm, sparc)
>
> Also queued.
>
>> You know, that's a much shorter list than I thought it would be.
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?staller=libpng suggests that
> there's opportunity to add to this list, though I don't know how many of
> these packages we need to worry about just yet.
All of the ones I checked are indirect deps via one of the above packages.
That was the pleasant surprise.
--
Nathanael Nerode
Random sig chooser not working today
Reply to: