Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues

To: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
Cc: Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:53:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 17079.676.15479.757416@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050620173321.GN8422@djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] 20050620130638.3242461902.qww314159@soup.acv.apexcovantage.com> <[🔎] 20050620173321.GN8422@djpig.de>

Frank Lichtenheld writes:
> AFAIK the timeframe is "really soon now". doko said he was only waiting
> for a pending binutils upload.

that upload was a binutils-2.15 upload, currently looking for a mips
problem with 2.16.1. gcc-3.4 and gcc-3.3 uploads will follow
soon. gcc-4.0.1 requires binutils 2.15.90.something, so a binutils
2.6.16.1 upload will follow before a gcc-4.0 upload. if that one is
built on all architectures, we can go forward with the ABI change.

  Matthias

Reply to:

References:
- taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
  - From: Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org>
- Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
  - From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
Next by Date: Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
Previous by thread: Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
Next by thread: Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread