Re: taking over ICU, library/C++ transition issues
Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org> writes:
> Given that nothing urgently needs version 3.2, would it be better to
> wait to do the ICU library transition until after the C++ transition
> is done? Do we have a time frame on that yet?
Maybe you can use GCC 4.0 to compile it and then already use the new
ABI of C++. So when the people start to use it can already move his
packages to the new ABI too.
This at last makes sense to me. What all the rest of people thinks
about it?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: