On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 06:09:41AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:41:17PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > >> aptitude 0.2.15.9-2 is now old enough to go into testing. This version > >>fixes a bunch of translation bugs and adds conditionally-compiled support > >>for the security features of apt 0.6 (this support isn't compiled into > >>the binary that I uploaded, of course, but it will make life easier for > >>users who want to use the new features). > >Approved. It may not be an issue at all post-sarge, but FWIW, I think that > > #if APT_PKG_MAJOR >= 3 && APT_PKG_MINOR >= 5 > >was probably meant to be > > #if APT_PKG_MAJOR > 3 || (APT_PKG_MAJOR > 3 && APT_PKG_MINOR >= 5) > Umm, that would reduce to 'if APT_PKG_MAJOR > 3' or is this some sort of > inside joke which I am missing. That would be sloppiness on my part, it obviously should have been #if APT_PKG_MAJOR > 3 || (APT_PKG_MAJOR == 3 && APT_PKG_MINOR >= 5) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature