Re: suggestions for packages to force to testing for security fixes

[Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>]

Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:10:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > lsh-utils 2.0-1 needed, have 1.4.2-8.2 for CAN-2005-0389
> > > lsh-utils 2.0.1-1 needed, have 1.4.2-8.2 for CAN-2005-0814 
> > > 	(Also has a RC bug though.)
>  
> > yeah, that doesn't sound like a win yet (though it's also built on m68k).
> 
> lsh-utils has following, worrying description:
> 
> --snip--
> Description: Secure Shell v2 (SSH2) protocol server
> ....
>  WARNING: This is a work in progress, and may be totally insecure.
> --snip--
> 
> If the description is not out of date (It hasn't changed since last
> stable), is this really something that should go to sarge?

Since it's in woody already, yes.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Life is too short to run proprietary software.  -- Bdale Garbee