Re: suggestions for packages to force to testing for security fixes
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:10:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > lsh-utils 2.0-1 needed, have 1.4.2-8.2 for CAN-2005-0389
> > lsh-utils 2.0.1-1 needed, have 1.4.2-8.2 for CAN-2005-0814
> > (Also has a RC bug though.)
> yeah, that doesn't sound like a win yet (though it's also built on m68k).
lsh-utils has following, worrying description:
--snip--
Description: Secure Shell v2 (SSH2) protocol server
...
WARNING: This is a work in progress, and may be totally insecure.
--snip--
If the description is not out of date (It hasn't changed since last
stable), is this really something that should go to sarge?
Reply to: