On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:32:26PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:41:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > > For some reason bigloo and skribe have not yet migrated into testing. > > > The only reason seems to be their quasi-circular build-dependency > > > relationship, so maybe they need hinting. OTOH, shouldn't > > > katie/whoever see them as a single migratable set anyway ? > > trying: bigloo > > skipped: bigloo (14 <- 1257) > > got: 4+0: a-4 > > * alpha: skribe > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt.gz > I saw that already. > > This has nothing to do with build-dependencies, it has to do with not being > > able to update either package alone without leaving skribe uninstallable in > > testing. For computational reasons, this is not done automatically by > > britney. > Hm, I'm not sure I understand what's going on here. The version of > skribe in testing depends on the version of bigloo in testing, and the > skribe in sid depends on bigloo in sid. It's sure that migrating only > one of them will break "skribe in testing", but I see nothing > preventing them to migrate simultaneously - it's a classical soname > migration, For computational reasons, this is not done automatically by britney. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ *All* "classical soname migrations" require manual hinting by the release team. > There is a new skribe release already, and a new alpha release of > bigloo, and I'd *really* like to have the current versions in etch > before I start messing with the sid packages. The hint has been added, so if there are no other problems, bigloo and skribe should both get updated in testing today. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature