[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Suggest removing or binNMUing llvm

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:03:58AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> llvm was compiled with g++ 3.3 on i386, g++-4.0 everywhere else (bug
> #330638).  As such it is sort of an ugly annoyance in the C++ transition.
> Perhaps a binNMU, or a removal, is appropriate.  This mismatch is present
> in testing as well as unstable since the same version is present in both.

llvm (1.4-4.0.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes.
  * Rebuild against libstdc++6

 -- Debian/i386 Build Daemon <buildd_i386-cyberhq>  Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:51:22 -0700

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: