[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gutenprint testing migration

On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 01:19:57AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:17:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

> >> One or more of these packages still depends on the removed gimp-print
> >> package, and is not ready to be updated in testing.

> > printconf still depends on gimp-print.

> That one looks OK (foomatic-db-gutenprint | foomatic-db-gimp-print,
> and there are transitional packages in any case).  The culprit is
> likely gs-esp, which still depends on libgimpprint1.  I hope that
> doesn't migrate just yet though--current the gs-* in unstable are a
> disaster.

> I could rebuild a new libgimpprint1 from the old gimp-print source and
> put it in oldlibs.  This should break that cycle.  Would that be
> worthwhile?

I wouldn't add it back just for the purposes of getting gutenprint into
testing; I don't think it'll hurt us any to take our time with the
gutenprint transition.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: