On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:19:25AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:52:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:45:48AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > > > for this P120 (whatever) i have *shudder* had to use a > > > 2.2.10-compact-pci kernel. > > > there exists a kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4 (which i might try at some > > > point). > > Uh, 2.4.18-bf2.4 was built solely for use with the woody installer, and is > > only available in oldstable. If you're considering using it as the kernel > > on a newly-installed system, > only as a drastic desperation measure, as you can see it is a step up > from what the machine is _presently_ running... And why are the 2.4 kernel packages in sarge not a better option? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature