[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: release policy text changes

* Blars Blarson (blarson@blars.org) [050620 23:42]:
> In article <[🔎] 20050619151539.GF10902@mails.so.argh.org> 
> aba@not.so.argh.org writes:
> There seems to be a conflict:
> >  (l) Mail
> >        {+/usr/sbin/sendmail must provide
> >        the -bs switch, unless the package conflicts with LSB.+}
> >  (p) Linux Standard Base
> >        Packages must not conflict with requirements of the LSB,
> >        v1.3.

> Perhaps the latter should be modified to allow for explicit conflicts
> with LSB for optional or extra packages?

Frankly speaking, I think that's too wide. If there is good reason, we
can always add an exception like for MTAs.


Reply to: