[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xmltex uploaded(was Re: xmltex RC bugs 262395/306595)

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 05:45:57PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 02:02:39PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > > I apologize for just noticing this, but the tag 'experimental' of the xmltex
> > > RC bugs 262395/306595 is incorrect.  xmltex doesn't even have a version in
> > > experimental.  I've got a feeling this is a remnant from it being initially
> > > assigned to the version of tetex in experimental.

> > > I would like to remove the tag 'experimental' and upload a fixed version.

> > You don't need the release team's permission to fix the tags on your bugs;
> > it's the responsibility of the package maintainers to do so.

> I understand, but since we're really close to releasing I didn't want to drop
> this like a last minute thing.

> > Likewise, you don't need the release team's permission to fix RC bugs. 
> > Please upload a fixed version of xmltex to unstable and let the release team
> > know when you have done so, so that it can be propagated to sarge.

> I'just uploaded version 1.9-9.


Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Reply to: