tags 304260 -fixed thanks Hi Bill, On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 10:18:49AM +0200, allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr wrote: > tags 304260 - patch > thanks > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:20:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Hi Andrés, > > > > I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug, which will be uploaded shortly. The > > patch is attached. > > > > * debian/patches/15_space-bug.dpatch: > > diff -u lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst > > --- lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst > > +++ lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst > > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ > > db_get lilo/runme || true; > > if [ "$RET" = "true" ]; then > > echo "Running lilo..." > > - /sbin/lilo || true > > + /sbin/lilo > > fi > > > > ;; > This patch is a noop, because lilo.postinst does not 'set -x', (which is > yet another policy violation), so the error status of lilo is ignored > anyway. This caused problems in upgrade-report bug #310653. Thanks for catching this. Looks like another upload is needed. :/ -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature