On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:06:19PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > Quoting Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>: > >On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > >>Just which was the right queue. Shall I retain the same version (2.0.5) > >>with an epoch or upload the new upstream version? > >If the problem is that you have to remove material from the orig.tar.gz, > >then an epoch won't help you. Filenames in the package pool must be > >unique, > >and epochs are not part of the filename. > >So, please remove only the unlicensed material from 2.0.5, change the > >upstream version number (e.g., 2.0.5.dfsg), and upload to t-p-u. > Thanks Steve, > I just did the new upstream version and uploaded to t-p-u. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature