[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Licence issue with sarg



On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 23/05/2005 alle 01.57 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld ha
> scritto:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:42:30AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> > > I need to upload a new orig.tar.gz and don't know how to do that for
> > > sarge.

> > You will need to upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates
> > since the version in unstable differs from the one in testing.

> > Which part do you don't know how to do? How to upload 2.0.5 with
> > a changed .orig.tar.gz or uploading to t-p-u?

> Just which was the right queue. Shall I retain the same version (2.0.5)
> with an epoch or upload the new upstream version?

If the problem is that you have to remove material from the orig.tar.gz,
then an epoch won't help you.  Filenames in the package pool must be unique,
and epochs are not part of the filename.

So, please remove only the unlicensed material from 2.0.5, change the
upstream version number (e.g., 2.0.5.dfsg), and upload to t-p-u.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: