[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#309584: Please approve python-xmpp

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:35:51PM +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> В сообщении от Пятница 20 Май 2005 13:42 Steve Langasek написал(a):
> > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:23:41PM +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> > > В сообщении от Вторник 17 Май 2005 19:05 Steve Langasek написал(a):
> > > > Hi Alexey,

> > > Hello Steve.
> > > According to your recomendation "normal" priority bugix is removed and
> > > the rest is uploaded by Cosimo Alfarano to testing-proposed-updates since
> > > unstable already contains newer package that contains fixes inappropriate
> > > for sarge.
> > > Please approve package python-xmpp version 0.2-rc1-1sarge1 for sarge.

> > I'm sorry, but I was expecting this to be uploaded to unstable per the
> > freeze policy, not to testing-proposed-updates.  Since none of these bugs
> > are release-critical, I'm not willing to let these fixes in via t-p-u.
> It was uploaded to t-p-u accoring to your call:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg00001.html
> In particular, this topic:
> >- If the version in unstable already includes significant changes not
> >    related to the bug to be fixed, contact debian-release about
> >    uploading to testing-proposed-updates.
> These fixes are already uploaded to unstable as the version 0.2-rc3-1, but
> unstable version contains fixes that you considered not applicable to be in 
> sarge. Also it contains some improvements that slightly changes internal API.

> The only way to upload _these_fixes_only_ to unstable is to downgrade unstable 
> version.

> So I consider that upload was made according to freeze rules. If you wish me 
> to downgrade unstable version, please let me know.

The freeze rules stated that t-p-u was only to be used for RC fixes and
non-functional (documentation/translation) changes.

It's too late now to try to get this through unstable either.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: