Re: Processed: Prep for removal of doc++ from sarge
- To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Cc: Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>, 292337@bugs.debian.org, Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Processed: Prep for removal of doc++ from sarge
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 02:46:43 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050520094643.GY5158@mauritius.dodds.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>, 292337@bugs.debian.org, Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87sm0ig8us.dancerj@netfort.gr.jp>
- References: <87acmrkmn8.fsf@hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org> <handler.s.C.11165331066246.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 87sm0ig8us.dancerj@netfort.gr.jp>
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:16:11AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> bug 292337 is fixed, and there is no RC bug pending for doc++.
> Is there any reason you want to remove doc++ now?
I don't think it's reasonable to try to remove doc++ from sarge now,
especially when the current bugs have been fixed. I agree that it would be
a good idea for packages to transition to doxygen for etch, though...
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: