Re: my watchdog package
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Not really, as I've checked for the existance of the old link as well.
> > If there is no S10watchdog the links are not removed. Don't you think
> > this suffices?
>
> What if the user has changed their default runlevel to 3, and edited the
> startup symlink for this runlevel only? Or, they want watchdog to start up
> normally in runlevel 2, but they have another runlevel where they explicitly
> want to not run it for debugging purposes?
How about adding a check for the existance of all links? That would make
sure the default usage gets update and does not interfere with the
others.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Reply to: