Someone please review this security fix for sarge.
(Also, just a reminder that my upload of gaim for some seurity issues
still needs a review.)
----- Forwarded message from Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> -----
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:02:04 -0400
To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Subject: Accepted nasm 0.98.38-1.2 (i386 source)
Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:56:06 -0400
Source: nasm
Binary: nasm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.98.38-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christian Kesselheim <ckesselh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description:
nasm - General-purpose x86 assembler
Closes: 309049
Changes:
nasm (0.98.38-1.2) unstable; urgency=HIGH
.
* NMU
* Patch from Moritz Muehlenhoff to avoid a buffer overflow in the outieee
code. Closes: #309049 (CAN-2005-1194)
Files:
25593262a0697b72a638c86687bbbf27 585 devel optional nasm_0.98.38-1.2.dsc
7067dd76fe83332d0b3a7a0d6e159b90 27591 devel optional nasm_0.98.38-1.2.diff.gz
16a471a88d9250cd9036310c389761c3 1546538 devel optional nasm_0.98.38-1.2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCiqJw2tp5zXiKP0wRAig1AJ9HHmPUhCVLCBTKN3VtT79cMqkFfgCdHI6B
/IDGvsJKBNTEQ50wGPc923Y=
=Imdf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
nasm_0.98.38-1.2.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.38-1.2.diff.gz
nasm_0.98.38-1.2.dsc
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.38-1.2.dsc
nasm_0.98.38-1.2_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_0.98.38-1.2_i386.deb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
----- End forwarded message -----
--
see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature