[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gnupg, t-prot and the release



On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:42:11PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>  I was told that gnupg might be updated for sarge with the version from
> unstable. Please be aware that the gnupg version has changed some of its
> locale strings on which t-prot depends for doing its work.

>  That means that you are strongly encouraged to update t-prot along with
> gnupg. That will close both remaining bugreports open against t-prot,
> btw.  If gnupg is not updated than please don't forget to update t-prot
> as discussed from testing-proposed-update which includes quite some
> fixes but is patched with the locale messages of the gnupg version we
> have currently in sarge.

03:53 <vorlon> Alfie: so, do you want to drop the RC bug on t-prot?
03:54 <Alfie> vorlon: It is there to keep t-prot along the different
              versions of gnupg.
03:54 <Alfie> vorlon: If there is no different version of gnupg in sarge
              and sid anymore there is no need for the RC bug.
03:55 <Alfie> The switch in the code is long enough sitting around now and
              tested that there is no real reason anymore to keep it from
              the release.
03:55 <vorlon> Alfie: well, gnupg 1.4.1 should go in in 4 days.  I'll add
               the hint right now; perhaps it's best if you wait 3 days
               before closing the RC bug.
03:55 < Alfie> Alright.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: