On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:24:14AM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes: > > I would be doubly wary of letting a new upstream version of a package into > > testing as an NMU. If James agrees that 1.4.1 is the way to go for sarge, > I've uploaded 1.4.1-1 to unstable. On balance, I think we should put > it into sarge. 1.4.0 has been in unstable for sometime without any > major problems and upstream thinks we should go with 1.4.1 for sarge > too. Ok, unless someone pops up with a new RC bug in the next 5 days, it's in. > 1.4.x does introduce a couple of new dependencies, namely on > libusb-0.1-4 and libreadline5. Again these are both already in > testing with the same version as unstable. libusb-0.1-4 is currently > only optional and will need to jump to priority standard. Steve McIntyre has confirmed that libusb-0.1-4 is already on the first CD, so this shouldn't be a problem. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature