On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:59:01AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > Looks like James is no longer interested in maintaining gnupg. He > > > doesn't respond to bugreports, and he also didn't respond to mails > > > from the release managers where they asked him if a newer version > > > of gnupg should get pushed into sarge. > > > So, how to proceed? > > It's a package with release-critical bugs; if the maintainer isn't > > able to take care of fixing them, an NMU is needed. > Any chance to get 1.4.1-0.1 (which I'm currently preparing) into > sarge? I would be doubly wary of letting a new upstream version of a package into testing as an NMU. If James agrees that 1.4.1 is the way to go for sarge, I would probably be willing to go with it since we know gnupg gets heavily exercised by developers; otherwise, I think we're going to need backports for the bugs in question. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature