[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Fwd: webmagick_2.02-7.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]



I have made a non-maintainer upload to unstable of webmagick to fix bug
#308755 (Build-Depends on dropped perl-transitional package), using the
patch by Russ Allbery in the bug log. Attached is the source diff
(debdiff of .dsc) between the old package (in sarge and sid) and my
upload.

Release managers, please consider whether this fix would be appropriate
for sarge. Thanks.

--- Begin Message ---
Accepted:
webmagick_2.02-7.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/webmagick/webmagick_2.02-7.1.diff.gz
webmagick_2.02-7.1.dsc
  to pool/main/w/webmagick/webmagick_2.02-7.1.dsc
webmagick_2.02-7.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/w/webmagick/webmagick_2.02-7.1_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 308755 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


--- End Message ---
diff -u webmagick-2.02/debian/changelog webmagick-2.02/debian/changelog
--- webmagick-2.02/debian/changelog
+++ webmagick-2.02/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+webmagick (2.02-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Changed build dependencies using patch by Russ Allberry: debhelper
+    is now in Build-Depends, since it is used in the clean target; 
+    dependency on perl-5.6 is changed to perl (>= 5.6.0). Closes: #308755.
+
+ -- Lars Wirzenius <liw@iki.fi>  Sat, 14 May 2005 15:00:00 +0300
+
 webmagick (2.02-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix to build by texfinfo 4.6.  closes: #214986 
diff -u webmagick-2.02/debian/control webmagick-2.02/debian/control
--- webmagick-2.02/debian/control
+++ webmagick-2.02/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ryuichi Arafune <arafune@debian.org>
-Build-Depends-Indep: perl-5.6, debhelper (>> 3.0.5), imagemagick, perlmagick, texinfo (>= 4.6-1)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.5)
+Build-Depends-Indep: perl (>= 5.6.0), imagemagick, perlmagick, texinfo (>= 4.6-1)
 Standards-Version: 3.5.6
 
 Package: webmagick

Reply to: