[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: vim-vimoutliner -- please allow into sarge



also sprach Matej Cepl <cepl@surfbest.net> [2005.05.10.1639 +0200]:
> 1) to create -6 version of package, which would have empty (or 
> fully commented out) /etc/vim/vimoutlinerrc.
> 2) to create -6 version of package without 
> any /etc/vim/vimoutlinerrc (everything should work as well, 
> because vim's runtime! is not offended when the file is not 
> available),

I prefer 1 or 2, but Steve has a good point. I think you need to
decide for yourself whether this new release really needs to go into
sarge. If it does, I don't think either of the above two are going
to make a big difference.

> 3) to create -6 version of package without a mechanism for
> loading /etc/vim/vimoutlinerrc

Does upstream support it?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
"not the truth in whose possession any man is, or thinks he is, but
 the honest effort he has made to find out the truth, is what
 constitutes the worth of man."
                                                   -- gotthold lessing

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: