[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please consider perl4caml



On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:09:20PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >You seem actually to have deleted the changelog entry of the last
> >upload, please revert that:
> Oops, the package got out of sync between John and I, I certainly
> didn't mean to delete it!

> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Does fixing this bug actually require the new upstream version?  If
> > so, it will have to be removed from sarge.  If not, would you like to
> > upload an 0.3.15-3 version of the package to testing-proposed-updates
> > that has the proper dependencies?
> Bug 307574 certainly does not require the new upstream version. 
> However, the new version does fix a memory corruption error(not in the 
> BTS).  I have since back-ported this fix to the current testing version 
> and prepared a package for t-p-u which just includes this fix (and 
> implicitly for 307574).  It is available at 
> http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/perl4caml/

> The only thing of note of the interdiff is that all of John's (previous 
> maintainer) arch directories have been removed.

> Let me know if you think this upload is appropriate for t-p-u.

Based on the changes described, yes.  Please upload to
testing-proposed-updates; we'll review it more thoroughly once it's in the
archive.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: