On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:17:44PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be > > worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via > > unstable. That wouldn't apply to whatever low-priority fixes upstream has > > thrown into 4.1.4, however. > So you're basically saying I should upload a 4.1.4beta2 with just the fix for > #304245 (assuming I can backport it easily -- I haven't checked yet), but > that the entire 4.1.4 wouldn't be accepted into sarge? Yep. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature