Re: autofs 4.1.4 in sarge

["Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>]

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be
> worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via
> unstable.  That wouldn't apply to whatever low-priority fixes upstream has
> thrown into 4.1.4, however.

So you're basically saying I should upload a 4.1.4beta2 with just the fix for
#304245 (assuming I can backport it easily -- I haven't checked yet), but
that the entire 4.1.4 wouldn't be accepted into sarge?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/