Re: gnupg RC bugs
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:59:01AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > Looks like James is no longer interested in maintaining gnupg. He
> > > > doesn't respond to bugreports, and he also didn't respond to mails
> > > > from the release managers where they asked him if a newer version
> > > > of gnupg should get pushed into sarge.
>
> I would be doubly wary of letting a new upstream version of a package into
> testing as an NMU. If James agrees that 1.4.1 is the way to go for sarge, I
> would probably be willing to go with it since we know gnupg gets heavily
> exercised by developers; otherwise, I think we're going to need backports
> for the bugs in question.
What are you going to do if James continues to ignore you as it seems
to be the case from Norbert's narrative?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
Reply to: