On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 10:24:31PM +0200, Christoph Siess wrote: > Bug 299207 wasn't as RC as it seemed to be. I adjusted the severity to > important because ipac-ng has several methods to store it's data, gdbm > is just one of them. So this bugs doesn't render the package > "unusable to everyone." > So please bring ipac-ng back into sarge because it's a commonly used > package with no RC Bug. Yep, approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature