On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:03:12PM +0200, Christoph Siess wrote: > i have just contacted Noel Koethe (the maintainer), he told me that he > will be on holiday the next week and so has no time to upload a new > version of ipac-ng. However he also told me that if somebody solves this > bug by uploading a new version the person should do so. > It looks like the upstream version solves the bug. > So could anybody pls package a new version? You'll want to ask this on debian-devel, not on debian-release. > Is it ok for the release team if I (non DD, but a few packages in sarge) > upload a new sponsored version of ipac-ng? I know this is not a universally held view, but I personally discourage sponsored NMUs, as they tend to result in uploads where the DD has neglected his responsibility to verify the contents. I *would* encourage you to find a DD who can work with you to get this fixed, but I don't believe that means a sponsored upload. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature