Peter, On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > The version in unstable is significantly better then the one in testing. As > upstream put it: > > Do you want to push for 0.9.0 to go into sarge? It is notably better > > than 0.8.16 from our point of view (and also supports amd64 and > > Unicode, which 0.8.16 doesn't). > There are a few small bugfixes that came out after 0.9.0.0 that I want to > include. I see no new feature up to 0.9.0.20 in CVS, only bugfixes. There are 106,000 lines of "bugfixes" in 0.9.0.16, relative to the 0.8.16-1 version that's in sarge; and it seems not a single version of sbcl since November has been allowed to age long enough to reach testing. I'm sorry, but now is not the time to push six months of changes on the users of tesing all at once. > common-lisp-controller 4.14 is only a bugfix release with respect to the > version in testing. This one looks reasonable -- approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature