Hi Micah, On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:44:14PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > I've just uploaded a fix to unstable for important bug #307620 in > package backupninja. It satisfies all the criteria outlined in the most > recent Release Update email which outlines what can move into testing: > > Version is the same between testing and unstable. > Changes are not significant (only a handfull of echo lines added). > Changes are only related to fixing the bug in question. > Fix is for severity: Important bug #307620. > Package "backupninja" has priority of optional. What is the intent behind this undocumented change in the package? --- backupninja-0.5.orig/etc/cron.d/backupninja +++ backupninja-0.5/etc/cron.d/backupninja @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin # run backupninja every hour on the hour -00 * * * * root if [ -x /usr/sbin/backupninja -a -f /etc/backupninja.conf ]; then /usr/sbin/backupninja; fi +00 * * * * root if [ -x /usr/sbin/backupninja ]; then /usr/sbin/backupninja; fi Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature