On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:41PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > I have four questions: > - gradm2, contains a wrapper shell script update, to use absolute > paths instead of relative ones (#307293); can it be pushed into > Sarge now or when it is ten days old? This bug wasn't filed as important, and I'm not convinced that it is. Is it actually useful for a non-root user to run gradm2? > - neon, I was asked to remove Siggy from Uploaders (#298370) by > Jeroen van Wolffelaar; also should I upload it to > testing-proposed-updates? No, please follow the guidelines laid out in the freeze announcement mail. > More importantly I should revert/reopen #285591 (but as it is archived, > I have no hopes), I just realised the last note after closing it with the > package update from Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> now, that it should be > fixed in tla. Thus the bug should be reassigned somehow or a new one > should be reported against tla. If it's archived, you'll obviously need to open a new bug. Two new bugs, really, one against tla and one against neon. > - kernel-patch-grsecurity2, some mistyped things in README.Debian > (#304974), should I upload it to testing-proposed-updates or wait > and do more changes before asking for it's Sarge inclusion? Why are you asking to upload to t-p-u? Read the freeze upload guidelines, please. > - mozilla-locale-hu, where I missed some updates, a new .xpi is > available. I would target t-p-u again. No, you would target unstable, just like for all the others. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature