On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:11:33AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > Hi again Managers, > I know that this upgrade request doesn't conform with parameters > outlined in Steve's announce, but I wish the new sarg can make it into > sarge. This is a minor upstream update fixing some segfaults errors. > From upstream Changelog: > . Fixes segfault, produced by inproper use of strncpy functions, look - strncpy > doesn't copy leading '\0' symbol! Can you explain the impact of this segfault? > Sarg does not have rdepends and really can do no harm... :-) The harm it does is adding to the release team's load if a new RC bug is found in the newer version you're proposing. Given the time constraints that apply to reviewing each request, we must assume that this risk always exists, so only packages that fix specific bugs will be allowed in now that we've frozen. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature