Re: util-linux for sarge
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:49:17PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:39:41AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > An alternative that is less invasive to sarge would be to drop libblkid1
> > support from a t-p-u upload.
> Well, the version of mount currently in testing doesn't seem to use
> libblkid at all... :)
True, and badly phrased on my part. An alternative if we want to get
the rest of the 2.12p fixes into sarge would be to drop libblkid1 use.
A source of many issues, and divergence from upstream, was the hurd
patch, which was dropped in 2.12l-1. Having that code, with it's bugs,
in sarge would be painful.
lamont
Reply to: