Re: apt-listchanges in standard (was Re: Release update: ...)

To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt-listchanges in standard (was Re: Release update: ...)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 03:28:34 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050314032834.GA21483@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <20050223212935.GS9897@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <20050222200716.GI9897@mails.so.argh.org> <20050222201504.GA18186@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20050223194620.GR26951@alcor.net> <20050223201546.GR9897@mails.so.argh.org> <20050223204246.GY26951@alcor.net> <20050223212935.GS9897@mails.so.argh.org>

* Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> [2005-02-23 22:29]:
> > There is no open bug to that effect.
> 
> It might be well a bug in the buildd - I can try to check that, but we
> need to make that sure before promoting it to standard.

Have you had a chance to check this yet?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Please consider pidentd 3.0.18-2 and portmap 5-8 for sarge
Next by Date: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Previous by thread: Re: Please consider pidentd 3.0.18-2 and portmap 5-8 for sarge
Next by thread: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread