On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 20:22 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 19:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Not directly related to 3.0r4, but while we are at it: > > > > > > Would be possible to remove packages in security.debian.org which are > > > already part of 3.0r3? > > > > Isn't that "not correct", since someone who installs from 3.0 or > > 3.0r[123] disks will need all of the packages in security.d.o to > > be able to upgrade to the latest secure revisions? > > In general yes, but normally you also have the regular links to > http.us.debian.org, no? Well, it's moot in my case (I track sid). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "All else being equal, you're safer traveling in a passenger vehicle that's larger and heavier than in one that's smaller and lighter." http://www.carsafety.org/vehicle_ratings/sfsc.htm
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part