On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:24:29PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > Now we are (almost) back at square one though it looks like it would've > > > taken only one day to get everything in. :-( > > Such is life. It also took us 5 days to wake to this. Had we alerted > > debian-release earlier, or with complete info at the time we did it, we'd > > have 2.1.63 in now. > > But what we need in there is 2.1.64 which will be the new stable. > Yeah, yeah, I could claim something similar. :-/ > > So let's > > watch over how the pieces build. > Okay, welcome to the real life. What's the gcc-3.4 blockage now? > Something is wrong here because in the case at hand it leads to mixing > two incompatible libstdc++ libraries! libgcc1 comes from the gcc-3.4 source package. This is probably related to the recent changes on ia64, which would have required a shlibs bump for libgcc1. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature