Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
Hi!
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > Now we are (almost) back at square one though it looks like it would've
> > taken only one day to get everything in. :-(
>
> Such is life. It also took us 5 days to wake to this. Had we alerted
> debian-release earlier, or with complete info at the time we did it, we'd
> have 2.1.63 in now.
>
> But what we need in there is 2.1.64 which will be the new stable.
Yeah, yeah, I could claim something similar. :-/
> So let's
> watch over how the pieces build.
Okay, welcome to the real life. What's the gcc-3.4 blockage now?
Something is wrong here because in the case at hand it leads to mixing
two incompatible libstdc++ libraries!
Such is life? :^)
-richy.
--
.''`. Richard B. Kreckel
: :' : <kreckel@debian.org>
`. `' <kreckel@ginac.de>
`- <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>
Reply to: