On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:34:32PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> (OK, so let's try out replying via the mailing-lists links. Sorry if
> this turns out bad)
>
> Matthias Klose writes:
>
> > hmm, upload a new gcc-defaults to experimental making 3.4 the default
> > definitely breaks gnome builds in experimental, if you get your build
> > dependencies from there. an experimental/toolchain would help in this
> > case.
>
> Perhaps one can assume that all essential and build-essential packages
> should be from unstable, while the build-dependencies are taken from
> experimental?
If that's the idea, why would you ever upload a compiler to
experimental?
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature