Re: Packages not moving to testing
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 04:25:57PM +0900, ehikory@mail.goo.ne.jp wrote:
> I've just been looking at the http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/ output, and found
> a number of packages that might be able to go into testing with a little help.
> I'm not very familiar with the hinting process, so I would appreciate if someone
> could translate these into the appropriate hints, or alternately explain why the
> situation in currently unresolvable.
Thanks!
> The following packages render themselves uninstallable when entering testing,
> and also have an unfufillable Java dependency. Isn't this allowed for contrib?
>
> charva/1.0.1-3 needs j2sdk1.3 | j2sdk1.4
> libitext-java/1.02b-3 needs java2-runtime
> jetty/4.2.19-1 needs j2re1.3 | j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.4 | j2sdk1.4 | java2-runtime
> rhdb-explain/2.0-1 needs j2re1.4 | java2-runtime
> freeguide/0.7.2-2 needs j2sdk1.4 | java2-runtime
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/02/msg00065.html
> The following packages render themselves uninstallable when entering testing:
>
> batick/1.5final-3
Should be batik; likewise needs Java.
> libxtm-perl/0.36-1
Conflicts with perl (>> 5.8). I've filed a bug.
> snes9express/1.42-1
Dependency snes9x-x is missing on a number of architectures.
> stardict/2.4.3-1
Hardcodes library dependency list rather than using ${shlibs:Depends}.
The dependency on libc6 breaks alpha and ia64. I've filed a bug.
> xmmplayer/0.3.3-1
> mplayerplug-in/2.60-1
Probably candidates for contrib overrides, when they're implemented.
> xfree86-driver-synaptics/0.13.0-1
Built on s390 despite its lack of xserver-xfree86. Anyone?
> The following package groups seem interdependent, but otherwise OK:
>
> ace/5.4.0.1-1, dbbalancer/0.4.4-6
> r-base/1.9.0-1, tseries/0.9.21-1
> sablevm/1.1.3-1, sablevm-classlib/1.1.3-1
All hinted in various ways. I'm not sure how r-base and sablevm will
work; we'll see.
> The following packages render themselves uninstallable when entering testing,
> and also have a dependency on the updated r-base:
>
> boot/1.2.16-2
> its/1.03-1
> foreign/0.6.8-1
The dependency explains why they render themselves uninstallable; I'll
ignore these unless they continue to have problems after the new r-base
is promoted.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: