Re: subversion transition from 1.0.9 to 1.1.1
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:35:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The library package name hasn't changed in experimental, which means that
> dependent packages shouldn't have to be rebuilt, right?
That is correct. 1.1 just added some symbols.
> This appears to be a low-risk transition in terms of its effect on other
> packages. I hope it's also protocol-compatible with 1.0.9?
That is correct as well, though some new features are only available
when both client and server are 1.1.