[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:24:29PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > > Now we are (almost) back at square one though it looks like it would've
> > > taken only one day to get everything in.  :-(

> > Such is life. It also took us 5 days to wake to this. Had we alerted
> > debian-release earlier, or with complete info at the time we did it, we'd
> > have 2.1.63 in now.

> > But what we need in there is 2.1.64 which will be the new stable.

> Yeah, yeah, I could claim something similar.   :-/

> >                                                                   So let's
> > watch over how the pieces build.

> Okay, welcome to the real life.  What's the gcc-3.4 blockage now?
> Something is wrong here because in the case at hand it leads to mixing
> two incompatible libstdc++ libraries!

libgcc1 comes from the gcc-3.4 source package.  This is probably related to
the recent changes on ia64, which would have required a shlibs bump for

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: