[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?


On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > Now we are (almost) back at square one though it looks like it would've
> > taken only one day to get everything in.  :-(
> Such is life. It also took us 5 days to wake to this. Had we alerted
> debian-release earlier, or with complete info at the time we did it, we'd
> have 2.1.63 in now.
> But what we need in there is 2.1.64 which will be the new stable.

Yeah, yeah, I could claim something similar.   :-/

>                                                                   So let's
> watch over how the pieces build.

Okay, welcome to the real life.  What's the gcc-3.4 blockage now?
Something is wrong here because in the case at hand it leads to mixing
two incompatible libstdc++ libraries!

Such is life?  :^)
  .''`.  Richard B. Kreckel
 : :' :  <kreckel@debian.org>
 `. `'   <kreckel@ginac.de>
   `-    <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>

Reply to: