Re: 4.34-4sarge3 uploaded (was: Exim4 upload?)
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubulle@debian.org):
> > If there are no objections from the exim4 maintainers, I can push -6
> > into testing, and then we can look at debootstrap again. Marc, this
> > means that any changes included in -4sarge3 but not in -6 would need to
> > be reuploaded to unstable once -6 goes in; which is really the case
> > anyway, if those changes should be there for etch.
>
> Marc, can we take care of this ?
>
> 4.34-6 is now in both testing and unstable, however the l10n updates
> you prepared for sarge are *not* in this 4.34-6 version.
I'm preparing an upload but I know Marc Haber already commited the
l10n bugs I'm about to close in the exim4 CVS....so I don't want to
interfere too much.
AFAIK, the situation is the following:
-Andreas Metzler, the maintainer is VAC
-Marc Haber, co-maintainer is maybe busy (Marc I maybe make wrong
assumptions)
-I can prepare an upload
What I propose is:
I prepare this l10n-only upload and send the patch to the relevant
bugs.
If I don't get news from Marc or Andreas during this week-end, I
upload to unstable (as the changes are made against unstable and no
change needs to be kept in testing only).
Reply to: