On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:50:09AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The problem is that libreadline5 is priority: standard, but should not > really be targetted for sarge as nothing uses it (except for rlfe), and > should definitely not have been allowed into sarge at priority: standard > after the base freeze was in effect. > > Fixing this conflict between standard packages requires either fixing > the priority of libreadline5 in the archive, or allowing an updated > version of libreadline4 into testing; since libreadline5 should not be > joining the default system at this late stage, I'm not inclined to agree > with the latter. > > To fix sarge until an appropriate priority override can be made by an > ftpmaster, I've hinted libreadline5 (and rlfe) for removal from sarge. Just to connect things, a RC bug report was already open (not by me) regarding this problem. It's #276452. -- ++----------------------------------------------------------------------++ || André Luís Lopes andrelop@debian.org || || http://people.debian.org/~andrelop || || Debian-BR Project http://www.debian-br.org || || Public GPG KeyID 9D1B82F6 ||
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature