On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 06:52:53PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 03.10.2004, 21:38 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > I'm not going to accept an upload to t-p-u that makes off-point, > > substantial changes to the build rules. Pushing this from unstable to > > testing might be doable, but being free of severity: serious FTBFS bugs > > is an obvious prerequisite. > > Moving patches around like you have here also makes it more difficult to > > use tools like interdiff and debdiff to review the changes. This is an > > absolute non-starter for t-p-u; for unstable->testing propagation, it > > means I'm likely to let the source age in unstable for a bit before > > pushing it in, since I don't have the time to fully review the changes > > directly. > I thought it might help to use dpatch. If you prefer to get back to > non-dpatch wget for sarge, I will do it. -6 is the package without > dpatch which I could reupload as -8 and after it went into sarge I will > change back to dpatch. > Do you want it this way? You are free to use the tools you want to for maintaining your package, and although I'm not excited about adding dpatch to a package that's frozen, I can accept it. If you think this change needs to reach testing with less than a 10 day waiting period, though, you'll need to offer a package with a smaller changeset or convince Colin to review the package. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature