Re: Hm?? why is doc++ removed?

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Cc: 268502@bugs.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hm?? why is doc++ removed?
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 23:32:05 +0100
Message-id: <20040905223204.GA10669@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <873c1x4ark.wl@netfort.gr.jp>
References: <873c1x4ark.wl@netfort.gr.jp>

* Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> [2004-09-05 13:09]:
> This is news, because I've been using doc++ for most of my packages.
> 
> What's the deal?

Don't blame the messenger.  See #265273
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

Reply to:

References:
- Hm?? why is doc++ removed?
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: woody->sarge upgrades on mips: glibc vs. kernel
Next by Date: Re: RFH: xsidplay
Previous by thread: Hm?? why is doc++ removed?
Next by thread: packages which dropped some archs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread