Re: Bug#264403: rpvm: FTBFS m68k: /usr/lib/pvm3/conf/LINUXR68R.def: No such file or directory
- To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>, "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, 265697@bugs.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#264403: rpvm: FTBFS m68k: /usr/lib/pvm3/conf/LINUXR68R.def: No such file or directory
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:41:13 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040818144113.GB10292@uio.no>
- In-reply-to: <20040818142134.GB8861@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
- References: <20040816213821.GA13189@uio.no> <20040816221425.GA14409@sonny.eddelbuettel.com> <20040817075434.GA21389@gluck.debian.org> <20040818022603.GA812@sonny.eddelbuettel.com> <20040818102259.GB32178@uio.no> <87wtzwity2.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <20040818111209.GA8411@uio.no> <20040818114657.GB6613@sonny.eddelbuettel.com> <20040818133646.GA9690@uio.no> <20040818142134.GB8861@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
[Cc-ing debian-release to reach an RM; please keep the discussion on the bug
as I'm not subscribed to -release.]
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:21:34AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> But when there is no shared one, the static one is used, which simply does
>> not work; this is not pvm's fault. The rpvm configure script assumes that if
> Sure is pvm's fault: You are violating Policy by not providing a shared lib.
*sigh* This is obviously hard. Let me summarize:
- rpvm should NOT check for a static library if it cannot use a static
library. This is a bug in rpvm upstream.
- pvm should build a shared library for libgpvm3 as of Debian policy (but see
below).
> Please provide a shared library.
Would an RM please step in here and assist? To summarize: rpvm refuses to
work with static PVM libraries on some (non-i386) platforms. (Due to an rpvm
bug, it does not detect this at configure time; this works by accident on
i386 and some other platforms but fails on others.) PVM upstream only
provides static libraries; Debian PVM has provided a shared libpvm3 for ages
but no shared libgpvm3. I am rather reluctant to hacking a shared libgpvm3
into a build system I am not intimately familiar with before sarge (I have
not maintained pvm all that long), even though lack of shared libraries is a
policy violation (or at least so it seems), as this has obviously been OK
with the world for ~3-4 years, and I don't want to possibly break pvm for
sarge.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: