Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <email@example.com> [2004-07-27 23:31]:
> > If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's
> > what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make the
> > freeze, since medium is 5 days and the 31st is 4 days from now, but
> > those are the breaks.
> I think the 31st should apply to uploads to unstable rather than
> testing. You basically came with your freeze announcement completely
> out of the blue and said testing will freeze in 6 days, not giving
> maintainers any chance at all to make normal uploads which take 10
> days to propogate to testing.
It certainly should have happened rather earlier, but the risk we're
trying to avoid is that we need to freeze base to coincide with the d-i
release. Uploads to t-p-u will still be allowed.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]